```php International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Field (IJMRF)
IJMRF
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Field
p-ISSN 3117-5066 e-ISSN 3117-5074 Editor Panel
Scientific Impact Factor: 7.954 Fast Track Review Decision within 24 Hours Permanent CrossRef DOI Assigned to All Papers Free Digital E-Certificates Provided Immediately

Publication Ethics

Ethical standards for authors, reviewers, editors and the publication process


1. Introduction

The International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Field (IJMRF) is committed to maintaining responsible and transparent publication practices. The journal expects authors, reviewers, editors and other participants in the publication process to follow appropriate standards of academic honesty, research integrity and professional conduct.

This Publication Ethics policy explains the general ethical responsibilities associated with manuscript submission, peer review, editorial evaluation and publication.

2. Responsibilities of Authors

Authors submitting manuscripts to IJMRF are expected to:

  • Submit work that is substantially original and appropriately documented.
  • Provide accurate information about the research and its results.
  • Use suitable citations for ideas, data, methods and statements taken from other sources.
  • Ensure that the manuscript is not simultaneously submitted to another journal.
  • Declare relevant conflicts of interest.
  • Provide appropriate information about funding and research support where applicable.
  • Ensure that all listed authors have made a meaningful contribution to the work.
  • Cooperate with reasonable editorial requests concerning clarification or correction.

3. Originality and Duplicate Submission

Manuscripts submitted to IJMRF should represent original scholarly work. Authors should not submit the same manuscript to multiple journals at the same time.

Substantial duplication of previously published material, undisclosed republication or submitting essentially the same research to more than one publication venue may result in editorial action.

4. Plagiarism and Improper Use of Sources

Plagiarism includes presenting another person's words, ideas, data, figures, structure or other intellectual work as one's own without appropriate acknowledgement.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that quotations, paraphrased material, references and other borrowed content are properly attributed. Manuscripts may be checked for plagiarism or substantial textual overlap when considered necessary during the editorial process.

Important: A manuscript may be rejected or subjected to further editorial review if substantial plagiarism, fabrication, falsification or other serious research-integrity concerns are identified.

5. Data Accuracy and Research Integrity

Authors should report their research accurately and should not knowingly fabricate, manipulate or falsify research data, results or supporting information.

Where appropriate, authors should retain relevant research records and be able to provide reasonable clarification regarding the methods, data or findings presented in the manuscript.

6. Authorship and Contributions

Authorship should reflect meaningful intellectual or scholarly contributions to the research and manuscript. Individuals who have not made an appropriate contribution should not be listed as authors merely because of position, affiliation or personal relationship.

Any significant change in the author list after submission should be communicated to the editorial office and may require confirmation from the relevant authors before the change is considered.

7. Conflicts of Interest

Authors, reviewers and editors should disclose relationships or interests that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the publication process.

A conflict of interest does not necessarily mean that a person cannot participate in the process. Appropriate disclosure allows the journal to assess the situation and take reasonable steps where necessary.

8. Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Evaluate manuscripts objectively and professionally.
  • Maintain confidentiality regarding unpublished manuscript information.
  • Identify relevant concerns about originality or research integrity when noticed.
  • Disclose potential conflicts of interest before accepting a review.
  • Avoid using unpublished information obtained during peer review for personal advantage.
  • Provide constructive comments that can assist the editorial decision-making process.

9. Editorial Responsibilities

Editorial decisions should be based on the scholarly and publication requirements of the journal rather than personal characteristics or inappropriate external influence.

Editors may consider the manuscript's scope, originality, academic quality, ethical considerations, reviewer comments and other relevant publication factors when making decisions.

10. Confidentiality

Manuscripts under review should be treated as confidential documents. Unpublished manuscript content should not be disclosed or used improperly by individuals involved in the editorial or review process.

Authors should also avoid publicly distributing confidential reviewer or editorial communications without appropriate permission.

11. Ethical Treatment of Research Participants

Research involving human participants, animals or sensitive personal data should follow applicable ethical and legal requirements. Where relevant, authors should indicate appropriate ethical approval, informed consent or other required safeguards.

Authors should take reasonable measures to protect participant privacy and should avoid unnecessary disclosure of personally identifiable information.

12. Corrections and Post-Publication Concerns

If a significant error is identified after publication, the journal may consider an appropriate correction, clarification or other editorial notice depending on the nature and seriousness of the issue.

Concerns relating to published research should be communicated to the editorial office with sufficient information to allow the matter to be reviewed appropriately.

13. Retraction and Removal of Published Work

In serious circumstances, published material may be subject to retraction or another formal editorial action where there is reliable evidence of major problems such as substantial plagiarism, fabricated or falsified research, serious methodological errors, or other significant breaches of publication integrity.

Any such action will be considered according to the circumstances and the available evidence.

14. Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools

Authors may use appropriate artificial intelligence or automated tools as permitted by the journal, but authors remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity and final content of their manuscripts.

AI-generated material should not be presented as independently verified scholarly work without appropriate human review. Authors should disclose significant use of AI tools where required by the journal or applicable publication standards.

AI tools should not be treated as substitutes for author responsibility, research verification, ethical review or proper citation.

15. Publication Charges and Editorial Independence

Where publication or processing charges apply, payment does not determine whether a manuscript will be accepted for publication. Editorial evaluation and peer review remain separate from financial considerations.

Authors should review the applicable publication fee information before completing payment. Any refund or cancellation will be handled according to the journal's published policy.

16. Complaints and Ethical Concerns

Authors, reviewers or other concerned parties may communicate legitimate publication-ethics concerns to the journal's editorial office.

The journal may request supporting information or documentation where necessary to understand and assess a concern. Matters will be considered according to their nature, available evidence and applicable editorial policies.

17. Commitment to Responsible Publishing

IJMRF aims to maintain a publication environment based on academic integrity, transparency, confidentiality, responsible peer review and respect for scholarly work.

Authors and other participants are encouraged to raise genuine concerns rather than allowing potential ethical problems to remain unaddressed.

18. Related Policies

Authors and reviewers should also read the journal's related policies for additional information:

Quality Standards
Multidisciplinary Journal, low cost journal ISO 9001:2015 Certified
```